Stanford Social Innovation Review
[…] the critical distinction between entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship lies in the value proposition itself.
For the entrepreneur, the value proposition anticipates and is organized to serve markets that can comfortably afford the new product or service, and is thus designed to create financial profit. From the outset, the expectation is that the entrepreneur and his or her investors will derive some personal financial gain. Profit is sine qua non, essential to any venture’s sustainability and the means to its ultimate end in the form of large-scale market adoption and ultimately a new equilibrium.
The social entrepreneur, however, neither anticipates nor organizes to create substantial financial profit for his or her investors – philanthropic and government organizations for the most part – or for himself or herself.
Instead, the social entrepreneur aims for value in the form of large-scale, transformational benefit that accrues either to a significant segment of society or to society at large.
Unlike the entrepreneurial value proposition that assumes a market that can pay for the innovation, and may even provide substantial upside for investors, the social entrepreneur’s value proposition targets an undeserved, neglected, or highly disadvantaged population that lacks the financial means or political clout to achieve the transformative benefit on its own.
Ventures created by social entrepreneurs can certainly generate income, and they can be organized as either not-for- profits or for-profits. [...]